<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cold Fusion back in the news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alt-energy.info/hydrogen-power/cold-fusion-back-in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alt-energy.info/hydrogen-power/cold-fusion-back-in-the-news/</link>
	<description>News and information about alternative and renewable energy, including wind power, solar power, hybrid cars, biofuel, fuel cells, hydrogen power, and climate change solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:19:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caesar</title>
		<link>http://www.alt-energy.info/hydrogen-power/cold-fusion-back-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-93116</link>
		<dc:creator>Caesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alt-energy.info/archives/553#comment-93116</guid>
		<description>Most gov&#039;t officials would not recognize Cold fusion if they were sitting in a warm bath created by it.  It&#039;s too simple to comprehend. They debunked it in the 70&#039;s &amp; 80&#039;s and they will do it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most gov&#8217;t officials would not recognize Cold fusion if they were sitting in a warm bath created by it.  It&#8217;s too simple to comprehend. They debunked it in the 70&#8217;s &amp; 80&#8217;s and they will do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USA has stopped FUNDING fusion project - SustainabilityForum.Com - Your Global Sustainability Community!</title>
		<link>http://www.alt-energy.info/hydrogen-power/cold-fusion-back-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-59413</link>
		<dc:creator>USA has stopped FUNDING fusion project - SustainabilityForum.Com - Your Global Sustainability Community!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alt-energy.info/archives/553#comment-59413</guid>
		<description>[...] areas went ahead in other countries, as shown in this article (claiming success in cold fusion):  Cold Fusion back in the news &#124; Alternative Energy Info  That article reports that researchers have used a process that forces deuterium gas under pressure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] areas went ahead in other countries, as shown in this article (claiming success in cold fusion):  Cold Fusion back in the news | Alternative Energy Info  That article reports that researchers have used a process that forces deuterium gas under pressure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.alt-energy.info/hydrogen-power/cold-fusion-back-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-59379</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 23:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alt-energy.info/archives/553#comment-59379</guid>
		<description>What do the late 1970&#039;s/early 1980&#039;s have in common with the present? It seems that every time there is an &quot;energy crisis&quot; the question of cold fusion reappears, and reports of progress are announced (which thereafter are soon forgotten).

While it would indeed be very good news if tangible and practical progress is made in this area, would it perhaps make more sense to focus on getting superconducting quantum devices to function at higher temperatures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the late 1970&#8217;s/early 1980&#8217;s have in common with the present? It seems that every time there is an &#8220;energy crisis&#8221; the question of cold fusion reappears, and reports of progress are announced (which thereafter are soon forgotten).</p>
<p>While it would indeed be very good news if tangible and practical progress is made in this area, would it perhaps make more sense to focus on getting superconducting quantum devices to function at higher temperatures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
